Showing posts with label blog action day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blog action day. Show all posts

Friday, October 16, 2009

Blog Action Day 2009 - For Climate Change


Bloggers around the world wrote about climate change yesterday for Blog Action Day 2009 - 27,000 posts worth!

See all the identified Canadian blog participants here on the official Blog Action Day - BAD - website.

And here are the genea-bloggers as posted by Thomas MacEntee at the GeneaBloggers website. Thank you, Thomas!

There might be a few more listed as genealogy blogs on the BAD weblist too.

Now - here are just a few of the non-genealogy Canadian blog posts I liked - in no particular order, (Yes, I liked ALL of the genealogy posts!)

Social History Timelines "Action Day: Mapping Ice Melt", Maureen Flynn-Burhoe.

Knitting Is My Boyfriend, "Five Things (that I don’t like to do) to Help the Environment" by Em. Warning - a bit of bad (pun?) language.

Cap Bridge Views, "45 Things You Can Do to Stop Global Warming", from the Capilano Suspension Bridge, North Vancouver.

Dave Ingram's Natural History Blog, "Blog Action Day: At the Edge of the Sea" by Dave Ingram.

Ms Writer: More Musings from Meaford, "Blog Action Day - Climate Change" by Natalie Meaford.

Bird Canada, "Blog for the Boreal", posted by PAT (Patricia Bumstead).

Thursday, October 15, 2009

A Change in the Weather - 1899-1900 in Manitoba, Canada -Blog Action Day 2009

Today is Blog Action Day, 2009.

This year's theme? 'Climate Change'.

In recent years, more and more of us have become aware of issues relating to climate change. We have dropped many habits that we now believe contribute to climate changes that are affecting people around the world and will affect our descendants in the future. I haven't used a clothes dryer for over 2 years; I use public transit almost always; I try to buy local goods, especially local foods. There still seem to be 'doubters' though and I do think some of my ancestors would have quite a bit to say to them.

Two of my Canadian ancestors were William Irwin and Margaret Carmichael, farmers who moved to Newdale, Manitoba, Canada in the 1880s, from Victoria County in Ontario.

For them, I'm sure it was almost automatic to think about the weather and I dare say they must have talked about it a fair bit. The state of the weather meant everything to their livelihood and to the well being and safety of their family, while for me, a 'city girl' who grew up in Vancouver in southwestern British Columbia, a place blessed with a very temporate climate, thinking about the weather didn't mean much more than 'Shall I take an umbrella or chance it?'

In their time in Manitoba, weather is often mentioned in newspaper accounts whether it was sunny, snowy or 'same as always'. Changes in weather patterns receive special mention.

"No sleighing, no snow, beautiful weather, and cattle out to pasture this 4th day of January, 1900 is something exceptional for Manitoba, but a change occurred yesterday and a slight snow has fallen, so that sleighing is expected shortly." Minnedosa Tribune, Minnedosa, Manitoba, Canada, 4 January, 1900, page 3.

For me, 'sleighing' brings to mind winter fun. For Margaret and William, it also meant an opportunity for those with freight to haul it out. There's a reasonably ecology-friendly and economical form of transport we in Canada don't think of much in 2009!


However, even in 1900, some were thinking of less environmentally friendly innovations. A Mr. S. Anderson of Winnipeg, Manitoba, demonstrated his patented Anderson Snow Locomotive which could be adapted to different conditions on the prairies with sleigh runners, wheels or rollers for hauling freight, for example. (Morning Telegram, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 13 March, 1900, page 2. Canadian Patent CA 59537, Snow Locomotive. Sigurdur Anderson, Issued 1898-04-05, Classification 305/15. Canadian Patents Database, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Government of Canada.)

The previous year, the weather had been so much colder than usual, some low temperature records still stand. A few newspaper writers sound a bit concerned, even when joking about it.

"CLANWILLIAM--Have we not had a cold snap? By Jove, Jack Frost is doing his best to make bears of it - keep in the house and suck our paws. Generally a cold spell has lasted only about three days; now it runs on weeks. Our climate is undergoing a change; we will have to go to the south of France." Minnedosa Tribune, Minnedosa, Manitoba, Canada, 2 February 1899, page 2.

In fact, the beginning of 1899 was particulary bitter in North America generally. (To learn more about this, do read "Freezing America: The Cold Wave of 1899" by the Weather Doctor, Keith C. Heidorn.)

I believe if William and Margaret had had any idea they could 'do' something to arrest catastrophic weather changes in their time and ours, they would have read all the articles in the newspapers, discussed and debated the issues with their neighbours and friends, and perhaps been more ready than I was initially to take action, particularly on the local level, to curtail activities that affect climate change.

Of course, in many ways, my farming ancestors lived more simply than I. Most of their food was grown at home or bought locally, for example, although supplies and equipment from away was transported in the main by rail and many trips they had were by rail. Early in their Manitoba life they likely used coal as well as wood for heat, but I know they had a generator for electricity in their house in town. Still I doubt Great Grandmother could have even dreamed of the sometimes wasteful conveniences I use routinely.

By all accounts, her husband, William Irwin, was interested in anything new, mind you. Could he have resisted buying or driving a Snow Locomotive? And I understand he did have an automobile. Would Great Grandmother have 'rationed' his jaunts around the district? I hope so!

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Women worldwide and Poverty - Blog Action Day 2008



It’s Blog Action Day 2008 today – this year bloggers all over the world are writing about poverty – most are calling us to action against poverty.

I’m most concerned about women and poverty – according to the United Nations, poverty among women worldwide is increasing, not decreasing, and “women’s poverty is a violation of their human rights to health and well-being, food, adequate housing, a safe and healthy living environment, social security, employment and development.”

Accordingly I want to introduce two of the groups I support.

The first is ‘MATCH International’ – “a Canadian women’s international organization guided by a feminist vision of sustainable development which recognizes the diverse realities of women and respects their efforts for self-determination.” Since the 1970’s , MATCH has been partnering with national and local agencies around the world. In Senegal, for instance, MATCH works with Centre Africain Pour Le Leadership Féminin (CALDU) to train women leaders to take places in local government and local community development.

The other group is KIVA – an innovative Internet organization that works with field partner groups around the world facilitating micro-lending to groups and individuals identified by the partners. At the KIVA website, you can search in a variety of ways to find a lending project you are interested in, perhaps, for instance, those associated with Pro Mujer Bolivia which for seventeen years has been assisting poor women entrepreneurs with small loans as well as with business training, health services for women and for children, and with literacy and other needed services. I’ve just this morning loaned a small amount to a women’s group in Mali who need to buy a variety of goods for resell, including smoked fish and firewood. This group is sponsored by Soro Yiriwaso, (a Save the Children partner) which assists rural women in Mali.

MATCH International: http://www.matchinternational.org/

KIVA: http://www.kiva.org/

‘Women and Poverty’, United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW): http://www.un-instraw.org/en/index.php?option=content&task=blogcategory&id=143&Itemid=171

Blog Action Day 08: http://blogactionday.org/

Here’s a post about Bolivia that’s just been published by an ‘Action Day’ blogger, Palegoldenrod: http://www.palegoldenrod.com/2008/10/15/blog-action-day-poverty-in-bolivia

Friday, August 15, 2008

Blog Action Day - October 15, 2008

I'll be participating again this year in Blog Action Day on October 15, 2008. Will you?

The topic: poverty


Monday, October 15, 2007

Genealogists -What about the Environment?

One of the first tools a genealogist reaches for, on discovering a new connection or query, is a map - but how often do genealogists really think about the environment our ancestors lived in and the changes they made in it?

The social environment of an ancestor's life is often examined - what rules, regulations and societal norms shaped or governed behavior and how these relate to the documents and artifacts that tell us about the past - but the physical environment is less often regarded. Occasionally, one will see or hear a reference in family stories to smoky London or Manchester, but rarely mentioned are the reasons for the smoke or the effects of it on people, plants or other animals.

My great grandmother, Janet IRWIN, née CARMICHAEL, who migrated in the 1880's from the areas of Islay and Cambray in Victoria County in Ontario, Canada to southern Manitoba with her husband, William IRWIN, and their daughter, Minnie, worried about how the environment she would find there would affect her own way of life. Both my mother and grandmother remembered Janet as saying she did not know how she would make soap on the prairies without trees for ash, for instance. Was she ever as concerned about the changes her family had made since the 1830's in clearing land in Victoria County? I would guess not - I don't think those changes were evident enough for her to see - and I suspect that anything she did notice would have looked like 'progress' to her, although clearly she was more directly aware of her dependence on natural resources than I, as a 'city girl' have ever been.

Genealogists do say though to 'begin with yourself' and for my own part, I remember how foggy Vancouver, British Columbia, where I was born and near where I still live, used to be. As an elementary school Vancouver 'School Safety Patrolman', I stood on street corners many mornings ringing a bell to warn motorists that school children were crossing the streets. (And yes, being awarded my Patrolman certificate was my first feminist 'click'.)

Now it seems amazing to me that I never connected this 'fog' with the dense smoke and steam from the lumber mills and other industrial operations in downtown Vancouver. I can still smell cedar every time I cross the Cambie Bridge -although it's mostly condominiums and fancy restaurants below there now!

I never remember this discussed at all when I was young, although both my parents recalled dense fog in the 1940's and 1950's. I know I did worry about nuclear fallout and Strontium-90 in the air (does anyone else remember the collecting of baby teeth for testing), but in British Columbia, a resource rich province, 'making the most' out of the environment was seen as a common good. The consequences weren't questioned till much later. It wasn't until Vancouver's fog was gone, that the reasons for it became obvious to me.

Nowadays it is evident to concerned people that we've replaced the local fog with vehicle exhaust -much of it is blown or drawn up the Fraser Valley so we Vancouver area people don't suffer as much from it as others do. I've never driven a vehicle & have always been an advocate for efficient public transit, but did I protest enough, early enough - apparently not.

What will my 11 year old grandson write in his genealogy reports about the environment of my day? I am hopeful still that my generation can make changes that will benefit the environment and future generations -the loss of farmland here and the lack of support for better transit which would take cars off the roads and prevent more pollution are primary concerns of mine. I see these as linked - the ideal here is still a single family house - more and more farmland around Greater Vancouver is being built over with houses, many residents of those houses then commute long distances to work.

Members of the Society for Environmental Conservation, formed in 1969 in British Columbia, are people who've been promoting action on environmental issues here for decades. I've just signed SPEC's petition for 'Better Transit, Not Freeways', for example. (That's one more record for my grandson to collect and file with my pedigree.)

If you live in Greater Vancouver or the Fraser Valley, please add your name to the 'Better Transit, Not Freeways' petition.

Society Promoting Environmental Conservation, British Columbia, Canada: http://www.spec.bc.ca/

This blog entry was prompted by Blog Action Day. All over the world, bloggers are sitting down today, October 15th, 2007, to think and write about environmental issues.

What a great idea! Let's do it again: http://www.blogactionday.org/

What Kind of Blogger Are You?