Library Boy, Michel-Adrien Sheppard of Ottawa, reported yesterday on his blog that there is a new survey of digital preservation activities in Canada on behalf of Library and Archives Canada (LAC). Survey results will apparently be posted on the LAC website in Spring/Summer 2009.
I think this must be the same survey mentioned at the Summer, 2008 International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) conference which was to
"establish a baseline of understanding digital preservation practice among Canadian repositories....Based on this information and through negotiations with other institutions, Library and Archives Canada can then move forward on developing a collaborative national digital preservation infrastructure. Responsibilities for preservation will be shared through formal agreements or will originate within institutions according to their mandates."
Quoted from "Library and Archives Canada: towards a trusted digital repository" by Pam Armstrong, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Canada, Preservation Infrastructures Session, World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General Conference and Council
'Libraries without borders: Navigating towards global understanding'
10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada
The preamble to the new digital preservation survey mentions the Canadian Digital Information Strategy, 2007, which "identified preservation as one of the major digital challenges for Canada".
If you are interested in the Canadian Digital Information Strategy - be sure to read the responses to it too - see LAC's website.
I don't see anything about the survey on LAC's website yet, but on 5 March 2009, there was a note about the Department of Canadian Heritage, Library and Archives Canada and Canadian Council of Archives's Archival Community Digitization Program (ACDP) for 2009–2010. For applications, see the Canadian Council of Archives website.
Application deadline is 30 April, 2009.
Note that this is the last year of funding through the Department of Canadian Heritage for this programme. Many of the comments to the Canadian Digital Information Strategy called for on-going funding and infrastructure support for preservation and digitization projects.
The Archival Community Digitization Program has given support to many interesting projects - few from British Columbia though. See Archives Canada for links to projects listed by year - from 2002-3 to 2006-7. The Salt Spring Island Multicultural Project from the Salt Spring Island (British Columbia, Canada) Archives, is included there under 2005-6.
Showing posts with label Canadian Digital Information Strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian Digital Information Strategy. Show all posts
Friday, March 13, 2009
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Library and Archives Canada - Need for Public Consultation
Last fall, Library and Archives Canada (LAC) announced cuts to full access hours at the Archives in Ottawa, giving very little notice of the changes.
There was a public uproar - many groups and many individuals made their feelings very clear in web posts, letters and newspaper articles - and by mid November, 2007, to give them credit, the powers at LAC had both restored some hours and promised to set up an "LAC Services Advisory Board"...composed of representatives from various user communities across Canada...the first of two components of LAC's recently-established public consultation process."
The Board first met 30 November, 2007 and a brief report of that meeting was posted on the LAC website, 13 December, 2007. Gordon Watts, co-chair of Canada's grassroots Post 1901 Census Access Project, who is now a member of the Board, commented on the first Board session in his 19 December 2007 "Gordon Watts Reports".
Although it's promised that Board minutes will be posted on the LAC website, that hasn't been done yet.
I do agree with Gordon that information relating to the Board would be better placed in its own area on the website, and not just under 'What's New'. This would make it much easier to keep up to date with the Board's progress. Since genealogists are, I believe, the largest group of LAC users, there needs to be a link to that information on LAC's Canadian Genealogy Centre as well.
There should also be a list posted of the 28 people chosen by Library and Archives Canada as members of the Board and their affiliations. Apparently these people were chosen from groups or individuals both known to the LAC as 'users' and as expressing concern previously about LAC's operations.
However, as the LAC Services Advisory Board report reiterates "The second component ["of LAC's recently-established public consultation process"] involves general public consultations, held on a regular and ongoing basis, concerning LAC's client services, with the first meeting planned for January 2008. LAC users will be invited to comment in person, by telephone or postal mail, or using electronic means over the Internet."
It is now 5 January, 2008. As yet no notice of this January, 2008 meeting appears on the Library and Archives website. On the 19 December, 2007, I e-mailed Pauline Portelance, Senior Media Relations Officer, Library and Archives Canada, asking for information about the meeting. To date, I have received no reply.
Public consultation without ample notice is NOT public consultation.
Library and Archives Canada's recent public consultation process for the Canadian Digital Information Strategy draft is an unfortunate example of LAC's current practice. Although LAC called "for comment by any interested person or organization", the draft was posted to the website without any fanfare 31 October, 2007 and comment was required by 23 November, 2007. Bloggers, including John D. Reid, of Anglo-Celtic Connections, were the first to comment, even before the draft was posted, and soon made it known along the web, so I hope many individuals commented on the draft. Few organized groups, however, would have been able to discuss the draft and respond in this very short length of time.
Today I will be writing both Ian Wilson, the Librarian and Archivist of Canada, and the Honourable Josée Verner, Minister of Canadian Heritage, asking for details of the 2008 consultation plan and pointing out the need to give sufficient time for public discussion, debate and comment.
I suggest that everyone in Canada's historical, genealogical and cultural communities do the same.
Links:
Library and Archives Canada, What's New, Notice Regarding Library and Archives Canada (LAC) Services Advisory Board (SAB), 13 December 2007: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/whats-new/013-320-e.html
Gordon Watts Reports, 19 December 2007. See previous reports for more background to the LAC access hours issue:
http://globalgenealogy.com/globalgazette/gazgw/gazgw-0105.htm
Anglo-Celtic Connections, by John D. Reid. His most recent comment is here, but see earlier posts in October/November for more about the LAC access hours issue:
http://anglo-celtic-connections.blogspot.com/2007/12/lac-public-consultation.html
E-mail contacts:
Ian Wilson, the Librarian and Archivist of Canada: iwilson@archives.ca
Honourable Josée Verner, Minister of Canadian Heritage: vernerj1@parl.gc.ca
Also re 'Canada's Digital Information Strategy' Draft, see
Library and Archives Canada, Canadian Digital Information Strategy, 31 October, 2007:
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/cdis/index-e.html
Michael Geist, blog - search tag - 'digital information strategy': http://www.michaelgeist.ca/
There was a public uproar - many groups and many individuals made their feelings very clear in web posts, letters and newspaper articles - and by mid November, 2007, to give them credit, the powers at LAC had both restored some hours and promised to set up an "LAC Services Advisory Board"...composed of representatives from various user communities across Canada...the first of two components of LAC's recently-established public consultation process."
The Board first met 30 November, 2007 and a brief report of that meeting was posted on the LAC website, 13 December, 2007. Gordon Watts, co-chair of Canada's grassroots Post 1901 Census Access Project, who is now a member of the Board, commented on the first Board session in his 19 December 2007 "Gordon Watts Reports".
Although it's promised that Board minutes will be posted on the LAC website, that hasn't been done yet.
I do agree with Gordon that information relating to the Board would be better placed in its own area on the website, and not just under 'What's New'. This would make it much easier to keep up to date with the Board's progress. Since genealogists are, I believe, the largest group of LAC users, there needs to be a link to that information on LAC's Canadian Genealogy Centre as well.
There should also be a list posted of the 28 people chosen by Library and Archives Canada as members of the Board and their affiliations. Apparently these people were chosen from groups or individuals both known to the LAC as 'users' and as expressing concern previously about LAC's operations.
However, as the LAC Services Advisory Board report reiterates "The second component ["of LAC's recently-established public consultation process"] involves general public consultations, held on a regular and ongoing basis, concerning LAC's client services, with the first meeting planned for January 2008. LAC users will be invited to comment in person, by telephone or postal mail, or using electronic means over the Internet."
It is now 5 January, 2008. As yet no notice of this January, 2008 meeting appears on the Library and Archives website. On the 19 December, 2007, I e-mailed Pauline Portelance, Senior Media Relations Officer, Library and Archives Canada, asking for information about the meeting. To date, I have received no reply.
Public consultation without ample notice is NOT public consultation.
Library and Archives Canada's recent public consultation process for the Canadian Digital Information Strategy draft is an unfortunate example of LAC's current practice. Although LAC called "for comment by any interested person or organization", the draft was posted to the website without any fanfare 31 October, 2007 and comment was required by 23 November, 2007. Bloggers, including John D. Reid, of Anglo-Celtic Connections, were the first to comment, even before the draft was posted, and soon made it known along the web, so I hope many individuals commented on the draft. Few organized groups, however, would have been able to discuss the draft and respond in this very short length of time.
Today I will be writing both Ian Wilson, the Librarian and Archivist of Canada, and the Honourable Josée Verner, Minister of Canadian Heritage, asking for details of the 2008 consultation plan and pointing out the need to give sufficient time for public discussion, debate and comment.
I suggest that everyone in Canada's historical, genealogical and cultural communities do the same.
Links:
Library and Archives Canada, What's New, Notice Regarding Library and Archives Canada (LAC) Services Advisory Board (SAB), 13 December 2007: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/whats-new/013-320-e.html
Gordon Watts Reports, 19 December 2007. See previous reports for more background to the LAC access hours issue:
http://globalgenealogy.com/globalgazette/gazgw/gazgw-0105.htm
Anglo-Celtic Connections, by John D. Reid. His most recent comment is here, but see earlier posts in October/November for more about the LAC access hours issue:
http://anglo-celtic-connections.blogspot.com/2007/12/lac-public-consultation.html
E-mail contacts:
Ian Wilson, the Librarian and Archivist of Canada: iwilson@archives.ca
Honourable Josée Verner, Minister of Canadian Heritage: vernerj1@parl.gc.ca
Also re 'Canada's Digital Information Strategy' Draft, see
Library and Archives Canada, Canadian Digital Information Strategy, 31 October, 2007:
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/cdis/index-e.html
Michael Geist, blog - search tag - 'digital information strategy': http://www.michaelgeist.ca/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)